Research and Clinical Trials News

  • PDF
  • Print

The anti-cancer efficacy of curcumin scrutinized through core signaling pathways in glioblastoma.

  • Saturday, 03 July 2010 23:30

Int J Mol Med. 2010 Aug;26(2):217-224.

The anti- Cancer efficacy of curcumin scrutinized through core signaling pathways in glioblastoma.

Su CC, Wang MJ, Chiu TL.

Division of General Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien 97004, Taiwan, R.O.C.

 

Abstract

Curcumin has been verified as an anti-cancer compound via multiple molecular targets. Its effective mechanisms include cell cycle arrest, inducing apoptosis, suppressing oncogenes, and enhancing Tumor suppressor genes. The resistance of cells to Chemotherapy, however, derives from the variable genetic aberration of cancer cells. Consequently, the core signaling pathways of glioblastoma have been explored to evaluate the efficacy of curcumin in proceeding through mutated genes in those pathways. In this study, the efficacy of curcumin was investigated in DBTRG cells. The cytotoxic ability was detected with MTT assay, and the influence of the cell cycle was checked with flow cytometry. The influence of the core signaling pathways was evaluated by Western blotting through the predominantly mutated proteins which included p53, p21, and cdc2 in the p53 pathway, CDKN2A/p16 and RB in the RB pathway, and EGFR, mTOR, Ras, PTEN, and Akt in the RTK-Ras-PI3K pathway. In addition, the apoptotic effect was determined by apoptosis-associated proteins Bcl-2, Bax, and caspase 3. Curcumin exhibits Superior cytotoxicity on glioblastoma in a dose- and time-dependent manner in the MTT assay. In the core signaling pathways of glioblastoma, curcumin either significantly influences the p53 pathway by enhancing p53 and p21 and suppressing cdc2 or significantly inhibits the RB pathway by enhancing CDKN2A/p16 and suppressing phosphorylated RB. In the apoptotic pathway, the Bax and caspase 3 are significantly suppressed by curcumin and the Giemsa stain elucidates apoptotic features of DBTRG cells as well. In conclusion, curcumin appears to be an effective anti-glioblastoma drug through inhibition of the two core signaling pathways and promotion of the apoptotic pathway.

 

PMID: 20596601 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

  • PDF
  • Print

Viruses Against Cancer: Complete Regression of Malignant Brain Tumors After Treatment with Parvoviruses

  • Saturday, 03 July 2010 15:26
Advanced gliomas regressed completely in rats after treatment with parvoviruses and the animals survived significantly longer than untreated animals. This was shown by scientists of the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungzentrum, DKFZ). Parvoviruses do not cause any disease symptoms in humans and the rats treated did not show any undesired side effects, either. A clinical phase I trial on parvovirus treatment of patients with advanced glioblastoma is being prepared in collaboration with the Neurosurgery Department of Heidelberg University Hospitals.


Particular parvoviruses normally infect rodents, but they are also infectious for human cells. However, they do not cause any disease symptoms in humans. Most importantly, these viruses have an astonishing property: They kill infected tumors cells without causing any damage to healthy tissue. Therefore, scientists in the teams of Jean Rommelaere and Jörg Schlehofer at the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) have been investigating over the past years whether these viruses can be used as weapons against cancer.

Many different viruses have been tested before in cancer therapy, particularly for treating those types of cancer for which there are no effective established treatment methods. The DKFZ researchers realized early on that parvovirus H-1 has important advantages over other viruses. Jointly with Dr. Karsten Geletneky of the Neurosurgery Department of Heidelberg University Hospitals they have now been the first to prove that Malignant glioblastomas regress completely as a result of treatment with these viruses.

The treatment experiments were conducted in rats who had received brain tumors cells by implantation. Once the resulting brain tumors had reached a specified size, the animals were given parvoviruses, either by direct injection into the Tumor or via the blood stream. In those animals in which the viruses had been injected directly into the tumor, the tumors shrank visibly after only three days and even disappeared completely in eight of twelve animals treated. The rodents survived without any symptoms, while untreated control animals suffered from severe disease symptoms within three weeks following tumor cell implantation. In the intravenously treated group, tumors regressed completely in six of nine animals. The animals have survived for more than one year now without any symptoms or late side effects of therapy.

The researchers found no infection-related damage in the nervous tissue surrounding the tumor. The viruses did not spread to the whole organism. Although parvovirus DNA was detectable in all organs after several days following virus transfer, this was only for a short time. The viruses had infected healthy cells, but these did not produce a new virus generation. However, in the tumor tissue, the viruses reproduced and viral protein production was detected only in these cells. In rats that did not bear tumors, the viruses did not reproduce. Thus, it appears that the presence of cancer cells is a necessary condition for the parvoviruses to reproduce.

After the positive results of these experiments the DKFZ researchers are convinced that parvoviruses are suitable candidates for use in cancer treatment. Professor Jean Rommelaere summarizes the reasons why: “Parvovirus H-1 does not cause any disease symptoms in humans. Since we are normally not immune against rodent viruses, it is not immediately eliminated by the human Immune System after injection. Parvoviruses kill tumors due to natural properties so that their genetic material does not need to be genetically manipulated like herpes viruses, polio viruses or adenoviruses, which have been used in other studies. Moreover, they do not incorporate their genetic material into the host cell’s genome, so we need not fear that they might ‘accidentally’ boost growth-promoting genes.”

Rommelaere’s colleague, Jörg Schlehofer, adds two more qualities that could be decisive for therapy of glioblastomas, in particular: “Parvoviruses pass the blood brain barrier so that they can be administered via the blood stream. In addition, they reproduce in cancer cells, which is particularly important for successful treatment of glioblastoma with its diffuse growth. Thus, the second generation viruses reach and eliminate even those cancer cells that have already settled at some distance from the primary tumor.”

Parvovirus therapy to be tested in clinical trial


The promising results in the animal model have encouraged the DKFZ scientists, jointly with Dr. Karsten Geletneky of the Neurosurgery Department of Heidelberg University, to plan a clinical trial on the treatment of advanced glioblastomas. Glioblastoma is considered the most threatening type of brain tumor; only about half of those affected survive the first year after diagnosis. Even innovative drugs that have been made available recently can prolong survival only marginally. Therefore, new treatment approaches for this type of cancer are urgently needed.

Preparing such a trial is a tremendous effort. Thus, large amounts of virus have to be produced under controlled conditions for toxicological tests. Therefore, even a large institute like DKFZ could not afford financing a transfer of these results into clinical practice. Continuation of viral therapy development was made possible only by funds from Munich-based company Oryx. The company aims to provide funds for the development of therapeutically effective substances into clinically applicable drugs in an early stage.

Many of the required toxicological data have already been obtained and submitted to the drug approval authority by the researchers so that they expect to be able to admit the first patients to the trial by the end of the year. In addition, DKFZ and Oryx have recently signed another agreement: Oryx will also get involved in the development of a parvovirus therapy against pancreatic cancer.

Karsten Geletneky, Irina Kiprianova, Ali Ayache, Regina Koch, Marta Herrero y Calle, Laurent Deleu, Clemens Sommer, Nadja Thomas, Jean Rommelaere and Jörg R. Schlehofer: Regression of advanced rat and human gliomas by local or systemic treatment with oncolytic parvovirus H-1 in rat models. Neuro-Oncology 2010, DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq023


The German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) is the largest biomedical research institute in Germany and is a member of the Helmholtz Association of National Research Centers. More than 2,000 staff members, including 850 scientists, are investigating the mechanisms of cancer and are working to identify cancer risk factors. They provide the foundations for developing novel approaches in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. In addition, the staff of the Cancer Information Service (KID) offers information about the widespread disease of cancer for patients, their families, and the general public. The Center is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (90%) and the State of Baden-Württemberg (10%).
  • PDF
  • Print

Concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by temozolomide and sorafenib in the first-line treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

  • Saturday, 03 July 2010 09:03

Cancer. 2010 May 11. [Epub ahead of print]

Hainsworth JD, Ervin T, Friedman E, Priego V, Murphy PB, Clark BL, Lamar RE.

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, when added to standard Radiotherapy and Temozolomide in the first-line treatment of patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme. METHODS:: After initial surgical resection or biopsy, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme received concurrent radiotherapy (2.0 grays [Gy]/day; total dose, 60 Gy) and temozolomide (at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) orally daily), followed by 6 months of maintenance therapy with temozolomide (at a dose of 150 mg/m(2) orally on Days 1-5 every 28 days) and sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily). Patients were re-evaluated every 2 months; the primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS:: A total of 47 patients were treated; 34 had undergone previous debulking surgery. Nineteen patients withdrew from treatment before the initiation of maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib (12 because of early Tumor progression). Twenty-eight patients (60% of enrolled patients) received 4 months of maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib, and 9 patients (19%) completed the planned 6 months of maintenance therapy. The median PFS for the entire group was 6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-7 months), with a 1-year PFS rate of 16%. The median overall survival was 12 months (95%CI, 7.2-16 months). Maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib was found to be well tolerated by most patients, with no grade 3/4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) reported to occur in >10% of patients. CONCLUSIONS:: The addition of sorafenib did not appear to improve the efficacy of treatment when compared with the results expected with standard therapy. A substantial percentage of patients (40%) did not receive any maintenance sorafenib, most often because of early disease progression. The administration of angiogenesis inhibitors concurrently with radiotherapy and temozolomide may optimize the opportunity to improve therapy. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

PMID: 20564147 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

  • PDF
  • Print

Emerging clinical principles on the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of malignant gliomas.

  • Saturday, 03 July 2010 08:59

Cancer. 2010 May 28. [Epub ahead of print]

Chamberlain MC.

Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Abstract

Despite advances in Adjuvant therapy, the Prognosis for most patients with high-grade Glioma (HGG) is poor, and almost all HGGs have a likelihood of disease recurrence. HGGs are highly vascularized tumors with elevated expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an important mediator of angiogenesis. A compelling biologic rationale, a pressing need for improved therapeutics and positive results from studies of bevacizumab in other Tumor types, led to the evaluation of bevacizumab in the treatment of HGG. It was demonstrated previously that bevacizumab, which is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF, improved outcomes when combined with Chemotherapy (most commonly irinotecan) in patients with recurrent HGG; and, on the basis of an improved objective response rate in 2 prospective phase 2 studies, bevacizumab was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration as a single agent in patients with previously treated glioblastoma (GB). Bevacizumab-containing therapy has been associated with manageable, class-specific toxicity; however, severe treatment-related adverse events are observed in a minority of patients. Preliminary data on bevacizumab-based therapy in recurrent anaplastic gliomas, in the frontline treatment of GB, and in additional patient populations are also encouraging. With the goal of addressing unanswered questions regarding the optimal use of bevacizumab, the objective of the current review was to provide a summary of the clinical efficacy and safety data on bevacizumab in patients with HGG, the practical issues surrounding the administration of bevacizumab, and ongoing investigations of bevacizumab in additional brain tumor treatment settings. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

PMID: 20564141 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

  • PDF
  • Print

Breast cancer subtypes and response to systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases.

  • Saturday, 03 July 2010 08:55

Cancer. 2010 Jun 14. [Epub ahead of print]

Niwińska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K.

Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: The aim of this study was to assess the role of systemic treatment after whole-brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) in immunohistochemically defined biological subsets of breast cancer patients with brain Metastases. METHODS:: The group of 420 consecutive breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated at the same institution between the years of 2003 to 2009 was analyzed. Patients were divided into 4 immunohistochemically biological subsets, based on the levels of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptors, and labeled as luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and triple-negative. Survival from brain metastases with and without systemic treatment after WBRT was calculated in 4 subsets. RESULTS:: In the entire group, the Median survival from brain metastases in patients without and with systemic treatment after WBRT was 3 and 10 months, respectively (P < .0001). In the triple-negative subset, the median survival from brain metastases with and without systemic treatment was 4 and 3 months (P = .16), and in the luminal A subset, it was 12 and 3 months, respectively (P = .003). In the luminal B subset, the median survival without further treatment, after Chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, and after chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy with targeted therapy was 2 months, 9 months, and 15 months, respectively (P < .0001). In the HER2 subset, the median survival was 4 months, 6 months, and 13 months, respectively (P < .0001). No significant response to systemic treatment was noted in the triple-negative breast cancer population. CONCLUSIONS:: Systemic therapy, ordered after WBRT, appears to improve survival in patients with the luminal A, luminal B, and HER2 breast cancer subtypes. Targeted therapy was found to have an additional positive impact on survival. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the role of systemic treatment after WBRT appears to be less clear, and therefore this issue requires further investigation. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

PMID: 20549816 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Page 1 of 96